Table
1: Clinical
cases used by the students to raise key-points about rational drug use.
Cases |
Description |
Case 1 |
Mrs. Zilá, a 67-year-old woman, began feeling
pain in her neck and head, dizziness, restlessness, and palpitations. She
consulted a cardiologist and, after a series of tests, was diagnosed with
hypertension. Two medications were prescribed to be taken in the morning on an empty stomach. Mrs. Zilá entered the first pharmacy that she saw after leaving the
hospital and was startled by the price of the drugs. However, as the doctor
had left her worried about the necessity of starting medication as soon as
possible, she bought it and started the treatment. In the following days, she
took the drugs only when she felt pain, and, as time passed, the symptoms gradually
became worse. Because she thought that the treatment wasn’t effective, she
asked her neighbour, who is also hypertensive, for advice. The neighbour told
Mrs. Zilá to double the dose of medication already prescribed by the doctor,
and also indicated a third drug that he was using. Mrs. Zilá followed the
neighbours’ advice and did not feel better. On the contrary, she needed to
return to the hospital with an even lower blood pressure. |
Case 2 |
Karina is a businesswoman that travels for work
very often and has had recurring headaches. But the medicine that she leaves
in her car for emergencies had not been helping her, even though it was not
expired. She switched, on her own, to another drug that promised similar
results. At first, it worked well, but Karina starts presenting rashes on her
skin, which intensified over time. The following week, she had difficulties
breathing, and her husband took her to the emergency. There, she was treated
and diagnosed with allergy/hypersensitivity symptoms, and, because of her
medical history, the doctor supposed that the allergy started with the last
drug introduced. |
Case 3 |
Mariana is a teenager who just had her first
urinary tract infection. She felt a lot of pain and went to the doctor for a
diagnosis and consultation. After all the tests, the doctor prescribed two
drugs and said that one was an antibiotic and another for urinary pain. She
took the medications strictly as prescribed, but noted that her urine was
different, orange-coloured, which worried her. As a precaution, she stopped using the drugs.
Following the persistence of symptoms, she returned to consult the doctor,
who ordered new tests to verify the possibility of bacterial resistance. This
led to the development of a new treatment without interruption. |
Case 4 |
Cesar, an economist, lives with his wife and son. He went to a drugstore to
buy his insulin and found a promotion in anthelmintic drug: every three boxes
bought, earned one more for free. He bought six boxes, leaving the drugstore
with eight of them for his family and parents. At home, he, his wife, and his
son took their doses. However, after the purchase, his parents reported that
they were allergic to one of the excipients of the medicine. The drugs were
only valid for two more months, which was probably the reason for the sale.
Since the drugs would not be used, Cesar flushed the pills down the toilet to prevent
their child or dog from accessing them. The packaging, bubble wrap, and
leaflet were discarded into the non-recyclable waste. |