Table 1: Comparison of surgical results between MIE-LP and OE.
|
Author |
|
Pts (n) |
Operative time (chest) |
|
Blood loss |
|
LNs retrieved |
Conversion (%) |
|||
|
(min) |
P |
(mL) |
P |
(n) |
P |
||||||
|
Osugi [37] |
LP |
77 |
227±80 |
0.031 |
|
284±80 |
0.99 |
|
33.9±12.0 |
0.90 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
72 |
186±35 |
|
|
310±170 |
|
|
32.8±14.0 |
|
‒ |
|
Kunisaki [38] |
LP |
15 |
301±68 |
<0.001 |
|
448±215 |
0.042 |
|
24.5±10.0 |
0.53 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
30 |
258±62 |
|
|
675±446 |
|
|
26.6±10.4 |
|
‒ |
|
Parameswaran [39] |
LP |
50 |
442 (305-508) ¶ |
<0.01 |
|
NA |
NA |
|
23 (7-49) |
<0.001 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
30 |
266 (219-390)¶ |
|
|
NA |
|
|
10 (2-23) |
|
‒ |
|
Schoppmann [40] |
LP |
31 |
411 (270-600) ¶ |
0.69 |
|
NA |
NA |
|
17.9±7.7 |
0.65 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
62 |
400 (240-550)¶ |
|
|
NA |
|
|
20.5±12.6 |
|
‒ |
|
Pham [41] |
LP |
44 |
543±72.6¶ |
<0.01 |
|
407±267 |
<0.01 |
|
13 (9-15) |
<0.01 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
46 |
437±97.0¶ |
|
|
780±610 |
|
|
8 (3-14) |
|
‒ |
|
Berger [42] |
LP |
65 |
NA |
NA |
|
182 |
<0.001 |
|
20 |
<0.001 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
53 |
NA |
|
|
619 |
|
|
9 |
|
‒ |
|
Nafteux [43] |
LP |
65 |
375±87¶ |
0.001 |
|
290±568 |
0.01 |
|
14.4±8.2 |
0.23 |
12.2 |
|
|
OE |
101 |
322±72¶ |
|
|
491±439 |
|
|
19.8±17.9 |
|
‒ |
|
Sundaram [44] |
LP |
47 |
420 (310-500) ¶ |
<0.001 |
|
500 (300-750) |
0.01 |
|
20 (14-27) |
NS |
NA |
|
|
OE |
26 |
480 (420-600) ¶ |
|
|
800 (550-1200) |
|
|
19 (15-25) |
|
‒ |
|
Sihag [45] |
LP |
38 |
360 (318-391) ¶ |
0.54 |
|
200 (150-250) |
<0.001 |
|
19 (15-28) |
0.74 |
NA |
|
|
OE |
76 |
365 (316-441) ¶ |
|
|
250 (200-400) |
|
|
21 (16-27) |
|
‒ |
MIE: minimally invasive esophagectomy; LP: left lateral decubitus position; OE: open esophagectomy; NS: not significant; NA: not assessed; total operative time.