Table 3: Comparison of surgical results between MIE-PP and OE.
Author |
|
Pts (n) |
Operative time (chest) |
|
Blood loss |
|
LNs retrieved |
Conversion (%) |
|||
(min) |
P |
(mL) |
P |
(n) |
P |
||||||
Smithers [53] |
PP |
23 |
90 (55-120) |
0.01 |
|
300 (15-1000) |
0.017 |
|
17 (9-33) |
NS |
3 |
|
OE |
114 |
120 (60-346) |
|
|
600 (0-3000) |
|
|
16 (1-44) |
|
‒ |
Zingg [54] |
PP |
56 |
250.2±7.2¶ |
<0.001 |
|
320±49 |
<0.001 |
|
5.7±0.4 |
0.14 |
5.5 |
|
OE |
98 |
209.4±7.8¶ |
|
|
857±82 |
|
|
6.7±0.5 |
|
‒ |
Gao [55] |
PP |
96 |
330±37¶ |
<0.01 |
|
347±41 |
<0.01 |
|
17.8±5.6 |
NS |
0 |
|
OE |
78 |
284±31¶ |
|
|
519±48 |
|
|
18.0±6.2 |
|
‒ |
Daiko [56] |
PP |
29 |
210 (130-395) |
<0.001 |
|
527 (28-4225) |
0.83 |
|
23 (4-39)† |
0.66 |
6.9 |
|
OE |
30 |
161 (90-272) |
|
|
495 (120-1185) |
|
|
22 (4-38)† |
|
‒ |
Yatabe [57] |
PP |
24 |
640±85¶ |
0.01 |
|
209±146 |
0.002 |
|
44±14 |
0.88 |
0 |
|
OE |
24 |
576±82¶ |
|
|
474±279 |
|
|
43±15 |
|
‒ |
Iwahashi [58] |
PP |
46 |
362±40 |
<0.001 |
|
125 (30-420) |
<0.001 |
|
23 (9-36)† |
0.77 |
0 |
|
OE |
46 |
234±44 |
|
|
255 (72-925) |
|
|
22 (9-54)† |
|
‒ |
Bonavina [52] |
PP |
80 |
330 (302-368)¶ |
<0.01 |
|
295 (250-335) |
0.08 |
|
32 (29-43) |
0.68 |
0 |
|
OE |
80 |
300 (270-338)¶ |
|
|
300 (275-340) |
|
|
34 (28-45) |
|
‒ |
Biere [59] |
PP |
59 |
329 (90-559)¶ |
0.002 |
|
200 (20-1200) |
<0.001 |
|
20 (3-44) |
0.85 |
14 |
|
OE |
56 |
299 (66-570)¶ |
|
|
475 (50-3000) |
|
|
21 (7-47) |
|
‒ |
MIE: minimally invasive esophagectomy; PP: prone position; OE: open esophagectomy; NS: not significant; NA: not assessed;
¶total operative time; †chest.