Table 3: Comparison of surgical results between MIE-PP and OE.

Author

 

Pts (n)

Operative time (chest)

 

Blood loss

 

LNs retrieved

Conversion (%)

(min)

P

(mL)

P

(n)

P

Smithers [53]

PP

23

90 (55-120)

0.01

 

300 (15-1000)

0.017

 

17 (9-33)

NS

3

 

OE

114

120 (60-346)

 

 

600 (0-3000)

 

 

16 (1-44)

 

Zingg [54]

PP

56

250.2±7.2

<0.001

 

320±49

<0.001

 

5.7±0.4

0.14

5.5

 

OE

98

209.4±7.8

 

 

857±82

 

 

6.7±0.5

 

Gao [55]

PP

96

330±37

<0.01

 

347±41

<0.01

 

17.8±5.6

NS

0

 

OE

78

284±31

 

 

519±48

 

 

18.0±6.2

 

Daiko [56]

PP

29

210 (130-395)

<0.001

 

527 (28-4225)

0.83

 

23 (4-39)

0.66

6.9

 

OE

30

161 (90-272)

 

 

495 (120-1185)

 

 

22 (4-38)

 

Yatabe [57]

PP

24

640±85

0.01

 

209±146

0.002

 

44±14

0.88

0

 

OE

24

576±82

 

 

474±279

 

 

43±15

 

Iwahashi [58]

PP

46

362±40

<0.001

 

125 (30-420)

<0.001

 

23 (9-36)

0.77

0

 

OE

46

234±44

 

 

255 (72-925)

 

 

22 (9-54)

 

Bonavina [52]

PP

80

330 (302-368)

<0.01

 

295 (250-335)

0.08

 

32 (29-43)

0.68

0

 

OE

80

300 (270-338)

 

 

300 (275-340)

 

 

34 (28-45)

 

Biere [59]

PP

59

329 (90-559)

0.002

 

200 (20-1200)

<0.001

 

20 (3-44)

0.85

14

 

OE

56

299 (66-570)

 

 

475 (50-3000)

 

 

21 (7-47)

 

MIE: minimally invasive esophagectomy; PP: prone position; OE: open esophagectomy; NS: not significant; NA: not assessed;

total operative time; chest.