Table 5: Comparison of surgical results between MIE-PP and -LP.

Author

MIE

Pts (n)

Operative time (chest)

 

Blood loss

 

LNs retrieved

Conversion (%)

(min)

P

(mL)

P

(n)

P

Fabian [69]

PP

21

86 (55-138)

0.0001

 

65 (20-150)

0.14

 

15.5 (7-30)

0.69

0

 

LP

11

123 (93-150)

 

 

80 (50-150)

 

 

14.6 (6-22)

 

0

Kuwabara [70]

PP

22

196

NS

 

50

NS

 

20.5

NS

5

 

LP

58

205

 

 

101

 

 

18

 

2

Feng [71]

PP

52

67±20

0.013

 

123±56

0.11

 

11.6±4

0.005

0

 

LP

41

77±17

 

 

142±49

 

 

8.9±4.9

 

2.4

Shen [68]

PP

35

68±22

<0.001

 

89±18

<0.001

 

18.2±2.9

<0.001

0

 

LP

32

87±24

 

 

67±16

 

 

15.4±3.3

 

0

Noshiro [72]

PP

74

310±67

<0.001

 

186±115

<0.001

 

48.7±18.0

0.20

0

 

LP

146

242±56

 

 

517±406

 

 

45.1±21.5

 

2.7

Ours

PP

67

263 (211–441)

0.76

 

25 (5–263)

0.002

 

46 ± 19

0.015

2.9

 

LP

37

272 (221–368)

 

 

229 (10–370)

 

 

40 ± 19

 

0

MIE: minimally invasive esophagectomy; PP: prone position; LP: left lateral decubitus position; NS: not significant.