Table 3: The classification performance of the conventional method and our proposed method.
|
|
Computerized classification |
||||||
|
Previous method |
New method |
||||||
|
Non- Dense Breast |
Dense Breast |
Match rate [%] |
Non- Dense Breast |
Dense Breast |
Match rate [%] |
||
|
Reading Physicians’ classification |
Non- Dense Breast |
11 |
0 |
100 |
11 |
0 |
100 |
|
(11/11) |
(11/11) |
||||||
|
Dense Breast |
9 |
13 |
59.1 |
3 |
19 |
86.4 |
|
|
(13/22) |
(19/22) |
||||||
|
Total |
72.7 |
90.9 |
|||||
|
(24/33) |
(30/33) |
||||||