Journals

Chemical and antifungal analysis of essential oils and phytochemicals against Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis

A B S T R A C T

The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical composition and antifungal activity of four essential oils (EO) and four phytochemicals against Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. The chemical analysis of EO was carried out using a gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectrometer. The antifungal evaluation was determined by means of the disc-diffusion in agar technique. The major components found were: eucalyptol (41.06%) and limonene (28.08%) in the EO of Cinnamomum camphora, geranial (51.17%) and neral (36.40%) in the EO of Melissa officinalis, (E)-anethole (77.14%) in the EO of Ocinum basilicum and citronellal (37.75%), citronellol (14.27%), citronellal (37.75%) and geraniol (18.84%) in the EO of Cymbopogon nardus. Against C. albicans and C. tropicalis strains, essential oils and phytochemicals produced, respectively, the following growth inhibition halos: C. camphora (11 mm; 14 mm), M. officinalis (32 mm; 30 mm), O. basilicum (32 mm; 30 mm), C. nardus (15 mm; 30 mm), alpha pinene (35 mm; 30 mm), citral (32 mm; 25 mm), citronellal (30 mm; 30 mm) and carvacrol (30 mm; 30 mm). Monoterpenes constitute the majority of the chemical components of essential oils tested. Phytochemicals have antifungal activity, inhibiting the growth of C. albicans and C. tropicalis.

K E Y W O R D S

Biological products, Plants, medicinal Oils, Volatile, Monoterpenes, Candida.

I N T R O D U C T I O N

Despite the variety of antifungal agents for prophylaxis and treatment of candidiasis, there has been a significant increase in the number of cases of infection associated with the expansion of Candida species resistant to available drugs [45]. In this context, Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis, species commonly involved with oral infection, stand out because they have significant morphological plasticity and expression of virulence factors associated with biofilm formation, invasion of the host tissue and adaptation to the environment [16, 37, 43].

The molecular mechanisms involved with virulence are related to the activation of the MAP signal transduction pathway (mitogen-activated protein kinase), where cellular responses involved in invasive growth, cell wall formation, osmotic stress adaptation and reproduction occur through intracellular signaling pathways such as MKc1, Cek1/2 and HOG1 MAP Kinase [28]. Other intracellular signaling pathways such as p38 MAPK, also relate to the pathogenicity of C. albicans [30]. Once infection is installed, pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1α and IL-2α are synthesized and induce inflammatory response [33]. Furthermore, the production of extracellular enzymes such as phospholipases and proteases contribute to the virulence of C. albicans for promoting destruction of host tissues [25]. Candidiasis is usually associated with immunosuppression and may represent a major cause of mortality in individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [40]. This is also quite frequent in patients with malignancies, especially hematologic [42].

Given the increased fungal resistance to available drugs as well as the high cost for treatment of serious infections caused by these microorganisms, alternative drugs should be developed, boosting investigations that consider the pharmacological activities of natural products, especially those derived from plants. In this sense, essential oils and their phytochemicals stand out due to their antimicrobial potential [2, 4,19,21, 24, 27,44,48, 49]. Terpenes, especially monoterpenes are characterized by the chemical formula C10H16 with biosynthetic origin derived from isoprene units, which may be cyclic or branched. The chemical configuration of these molecules gives them hydrophobic property, allowing deposition on the lipophilic structures of microorganisms such as the plasma membrane, leading to increased permeability with consequent loss of essential electrolytes for cell survival [4]. It was observed that terpene alcohols such as citronellal, citronellol, geraniol and linallol act as desiccants and solvents that cause protein denaturation [11].

This study aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of essential oils from Cinnamomum camphora (white camphor), Melissa officinalis (lemongrass), Ocimum basilicum (basil) and Cymbopogon nardus (citronella), as well as the antifungal activity of these compounds and four phytochemicals: alpha pinene, citral, citronellal and carvacrol against C. albicans and C. tropicalis.

Material and Methods

Essential oils and phytochemicals used were obtained from Quinari Fragrâncias e Cosméticos Ltda.®, Paraná, Brazil and Sigma-Aldrich®, São Paulo, Brazil, respectively, as described in (Table 1). Candida albicans (ATCC 76645) and Candida tropicalis (ATCC 13803) strains were used. Samples were subcultured in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) (DIFCO®) and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. Then, fungal suspensions were made in sterile 0.9% saline, equivalent to barium sulfate suspension of tube No. 0.5 of the McFarland scale and adjusted to 90% transmittance in spectrophotometer (Leitz-photometer 340-800), corresponding to approximately 106 CFU / mL [10, 13].

Table 1. Essential oils and phytochemicals.

 

Essential oils and phytochemicals

Part of the plant

Manufacturers

Cinnamomum camphora

Stem bark

QUINARI®

Ocinum basilicum

Leaves

QUINARI®

Cymbopogon nardus

Leaves

QUINARI®

Melissa officinalis

Leaves

QUINARI®

α-pinene

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Citral (mixture of geranial and neral)

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Citronellal

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Carvacrol

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Figure 1: Chemical structures of phytochemicals evaluated.

Chemical characterization of essential oils

Chromatographic analysis was performed using a gas chromatograph coupled to mass spectrometer (Shimadzu GC-MS-QP5050A) with capillary column (J & W SCIENTIFIC®), stationary phase of 5% phenyl and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane with 30 m in length, 0.25 mm of internal diameter and 0.25 mm of film thickness. Initial temperature programming ranged from 60°C to 240°C (3°C / min), while the run programming time was 60 minutes, and the oven injector temperature was 250°C. Helium was used as carrier gas (mobile phase) at flow rate of 1.0 mL / min with 1:20 split ratio and injection volume of 1 µL. The identification of compounds was performed by comparing their mass spectra with those in the database of the equipment (MIST Library, 2008). Samples of essential oils were injected at concentration of 2 ppm and hexane was used as solvent and the integration parameters used were Width: 3 and Slope: 2000.

Antifungal evaluation

The antifungal evaluation was determined by disc-diffusion in agar in ASD [7]. Petri dishes containing ASD were cultivated by the exhaustion technique. Subsequently, filter paper discs with 6.0 mm in diameter containing 20 µL of essential oils and phytochemicals were placed in the culture medium and plates were incubated in an incubator at 35°C for 24 hours. Nystatin (50 mg / mL) was used as positive control and the experiment was performed in triplicate. The results of the susceptibility of products were expressed by the diameter of the fungal growth inhibition halo, considering the following parameters: less than 9 mm, not active (NA); 9-14 mm, partly active (PA); greater than 14-17 mm, active (A) and greater than 17 mm, very active (VA) [3].

Results

The analyses for chemical characterization of essential oils are described in (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5), highlighting the presence of eucalyptol (41.06%) and limonene (28.08%) in the EO of C. camphora, geranial (51.17%) and neral (36.40%) in the EO of M. officinalis, (E)-anethole (77.14%) in the EO of O. basilicum and citronellal (37.75%), citronellol (14.27%) and geraniol (18.84%) in the EO of C. nardus. The chemical structures of the main phytochemicals identified in the essential oils tested are represented in (Figure 2).

Table 2: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Cinnamomum camphor.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

5.765

α-thujene

0.11

Peak 2

5.979

α-pinene

11.41

Peak 3

6.207

-

0.09

Peak 4

6.402

Camphene

0.24

Peak 5

7.093

Sabinene

1.39

Peak 6

7.222

β-pinene

1.33

Peak 7

7.439

6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one

0.29

Peak 8

7.573

Myrcene

1.83

Peak 9

8.071

α-phellandrene

0.64

Peak 10

8.487

α-terpinene

1.17

Peak 11

8.779

ρ-cymene

10.40

Peak 12

8.953

Limonene

28.08

Peak 13

9.057

Eucalyptol

41.06

Peak 14

9.580

(E)-β-Ocimene

0.13

Peak 15

10.032

ɣ-terpinene

0.79

Peak 16

13.579

Camphor

0.26

Peak 17

15.563

α-terpineol

0.78

TOTAL

 

-

100.00

Table 3: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Melissa officinalis.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

6.397

Camphene

0.38

Peak 2

7.429

6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one

1.16

Peak 3

10.496

Dipentyl ketone

0.76

Peak 4

13.520

-

0.18

Peak 5

13.766

trans-chrysanthemol

0.14

Peak 6

13.865

Citronellal

0.42

Peak 7

14.370

Isogeranial

1.80

Peak 8

17.193

Citronellol

0.86

Peak 9

17.841

Neral

36.40

Peak 10

18.372

Nerol

1.07

Peak 11

19.189

Geranial

51.17

Peak 12

20.082

2-Undecanone

0.35

Peak 13

24.067

Neryl acetate

1.03

Peak 14

25.707

(E)-Caryophyllene

2.15

Peak 15

29.712

ɣ-candinene

1.37

Peak 16

32.558

Caryophyllene oxide

0.78

TOTAL

 

-

100.00

Table 4: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Ocinum basilicum.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

8.907

Limonene

0.23

Peak 2

9.022

Eucalyptol

0.17

Peak 3

11.639

Linalool

18.34

Peak 4

13.948

Isomenthone

0.17

Peak 5

14.423

Menthol

1.11

Peak 6

16.010

(E)-anethole

77.14

Peak 7

19.101

Geranial

0.39

Peak 8

25.712

(E)-caryophyllene

0.47

Peak 9

26.352

cis-α-bergamotene

0.62

Peak 10

30.822

(Z)-α-bisabolene

1.28

Peak 11

31.903

ρ-methoxy-cinnamaldehyde

0.09

TOTAL

 

-

100,00

Table 5: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Cymbopogon nardus.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

8.892

Limonene

3.17

Peak 2

9.226

1-methyl-piperidine

7.78

Peak 3

11.581

Linalool

0.48

Peak 4

13.554

Isoisopulegol

0.87

Peak 5

13.889

Citronellal

37.75

Peak 6

17.183

Citronellol

14.27

Peak 7

18.380

Geraniol

18.84

Peak 8

22.698

Geranial

0.41

Peak 9

22.698

Citronellyl acetate

3.31

Peak 10

22.973

Eugenol

0.64

Peak 11

24.047

Neryl acetate

2.46

Peak 12

24.468

β-elemene

1.93

Peak 13

28.311

α-cadinene

1.04

Peak 14

29.111

α-muurolene

0.48

Peak 15

29.690

ɣ-cadinene

0.54

Peak 16

30.065

Δ-cadinene

1.71

Peak 17

31.107

α-elemol

2.59

Peak 18

32.194

ɣ-muurolene

1.10

Peak 19

35.328

Cadin-4-en-10-ol

0.63

TOTAL

 

-

100,00

Regarding antifungal activity, all products showed anti-candida activity (Table 6), highlighting essential oils of M. officinalis and O. basilicum, which promoted fungal growth inhibition halos of 32 and 30 mm for C. albicans and C. tropicalis strains, respectively. Among phytochemicals, α-pinene inhibited the growth of these organisms, leading to the formation of halos of 35 and 30 mm for C. albicans and C. tropicalis, respectively.

Figure 2: Chemical structures of the main phytochemicals identified in the essential oils tested.

Table 6:  Inhibition hales (mm) of essential oils and phytochemicals against Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis strains.

 

 

 

 

Essential oils and phytochemicals

C. albicans

       C. tropicalis

 

 

 

Cinnamomum camphora

11

14

Melissa officinalis

32

30

Ocimum basilicum

32

30

Cymbopogon nardus

15

30

Alfa pineno

35

30

Citral

32

25

Citronelal

30

30

Carvacrol

 30

30

Nistatina (control)

40

41

Discussion

The knowledge of the chemical composition of natural products allows understanding, from the molecular point of view, the action of phytochemicals, as well as the relationship between chemical structure and pharmacological action, considering pharmacodynamic aspects. This information indicates useful pharmacotherapeutic properties of a particular substance, so it can be an effective new drug candidate [6]. It is in this context that natural products have gained prominence within the pharmaceutical industry as they inspire new bioactive molecular patterns [46]. Camphor is the phytochemical most isolated from EO obtained from leaves and bark of C. camphora [35, 36]. In this study, there was a significant presence of limonene and eucalyptol in EO extracted from the bark of this plant. This diversity in the chemical composition of EO can be explained from the growth conditions (incubation time, temperature, oxygen content), collection and extraction technique [38]. Similarly, to findings described in literature, the most abundant components present in the EO of M. officinalis were monoterpenes geraniol and neral [26, 41].

Linalool and (E)-anethole stood out as the major components present in the EO of O. basilicum. Regardless of the period of collection of the botanical material, considering the seasonal variation, linalool was the most isolated compound (56.7 - 60.6%) of EO obtained from the shoots of this plant [17]. Citronellal, citronellol and geraniol were the components most isolated from EO from C. nardus leaves. Similar result was observed, indicating significant presence of monoterpenes: citronellal (36.67%), citronellol (11.40%) and geraniol (25.05%) [8]. Also, we identified the presence of citronellal (29.7%) and geraniol (24.2%) in the EO extracted from the shoots of C. nardus [23].

Agar diffusion test was used in this study to identify the activity of EO and phytochemicals in inhibiting the growth of C. albicans and C. tropicalis. This method of simple execution and low cost represents a qualitative assessment of the pharmacological action, since factors related to the products under study such as lipid solubility, influence their diffusion in the culture medium and hence determine the results obtained [34]. Therefore, comparisons between the products evaluated are not recommended, although the agar diffusion test is recognized as an important method for pharmacological screening of products with possible antimicrobial activity [31, 39]. The microorganisms selected for this study are considered to be clinically relevant etiological agents, which makes it important to control. Epidemiological data indicate a high prevalence of these infections in hospital, especially in immunosuppressed individuals [29, 33].

Essential oils of M. officinalis, and O. basilicum and phytochemicals α-pinene, citral, citronellal and carvacrol were considered very active against C. albicans strain [3]. Essential oils of C. camphora and C. nardus were considered active and partially active, respectively. With respect to C. tropicalis, essential oils and phytochemicals have been recognized as very active, with the exception of essential oil of C. camphora, which was classified as partially active. The antifungal activity of the essential oil of C. camphora was evaluated against C. albicans and a growth inhibition halo of 10.6 mm was observed [12]. Likewise, evaluated the antifungal activity of O. basilicum and observed growth inhibition halo ranging from 27 to 35 mm for C. albicans [1, 5, 9]. In another study, analyzed the antifungal activity of M. officinalis and a growth inhibition halo of up to 16 mm was observed [20]. The scientific literature also shows antifungal activity of the essential oil of C. nardus [22, 50]. This research demonstrated that phytochemicals α-pinene, citral, citronellal and carvacrol showed antifungal activity against Candida strains, which is consistent with studies reported in literature [22, 50]. These phytochemicals are small and generally hydrophobic organic biomolecules, designated as natural antibiotics, which exert their antimicrobial action possibly by disrupting the cytoplasmic membrane [15]. The data analysis of this research, which considers the relationship between chemical structure and biological activity, contributes to the understanding of the anti-Candida activity evidenced by essential oils and phytochemicals assessed in this study, although minor components present in essential oils can assist in the expression of the biological activity through synergism mechanism [47]. Regarding the antifungal action, mechanisms of action of essential oils seem to be predominantly on the fungal cell membrane, increasing its permeability and causing cell death; blocking the synthesis of membrane; inhibiting spore germination, proliferation of fungi and cellular respiration [14]. Due to the high volatility and lipophilicity of essential oils, they readily penetrate the cell membrane and exert their biological effects [18].

The results of this study suggest the conduction of tests to quantitatively assess the anti-Candida activity of essential oils and their phytochemicals, increasing the number of strains, either in the platonic form or biofilms, and investigations to elucidate their possible mechanism of action and toxicological standard for human cells.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Laboratory of Mycology, Center for Health Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba for providing the fungal strains used in this study.

Article Info

Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Mon 21, Jan 2019
Accepted: Mon 11, Mar 2019
Published: Fri 29, Mar 2019
Copyright
© 2023 Ricardo Castro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.CMR.2018.01.005

Science Repository

Figure 1:Chemical structures of phytochemicals evaluated.

Science Repository

Figure 2: Chemical structures of the main phytochemicals identified in the essential oils tested.

Table 1. Essential oils and phytochemicals.

 

Essential oils and phytochemicals

Part of the plant

Manufacturers

Cinnamomum camphora

Stem bark

QUINARI®

Ocinum basilicum

Leaves

QUINARI®

Cymbopogon nardus

Leaves

QUINARI®

Melissa officinalis

Leaves

QUINARI®

α-pinene

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Citral (mixture of geranial and neral)

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Citronellal

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Carvacrol

-

SIGMA-ALDRICH®

Table 2: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Cinnamomum camphor.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

5.765

α-thujene

0.11

Peak 2

5.979

α-pinene

11.41

Peak 3

6.207

-

0.09

Peak 4

6.402

Camphene

0.24

Peak 5

7.093

Sabinene

1.39

Peak 6

7.222

β-pinene

1.33

Peak 7

7.439

6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one

0.29

Peak 8

7.573

Myrcene

1.83

Peak 9

8.071

α-phellandrene

0.64

Peak 10

8.487

α-terpinene

1.17

Peak 11

8.779

ρ-cymene

10.40

Peak 12

8.953

Limonene

28.08

Peak 13

9.057

Eucalyptol

41.06

Peak 14

9.580

(E)-β-Ocimene

0.13

Peak 15

10.032

ɣ-terpinene

0.79

Peak 16

13.579

Camphor

0.26

Peak 17

15.563

α-terpineol

0.78

TOTAL

 

-

100.00

Table 3: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Melissa officinalis.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

6.397

Camphene

0.38

Peak 2

7.429

6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one

1.16

Peak 3

10.496

Dipentyl ketone

0.76

Peak 4

13.520

-

0.18

Peak 5

13.766

trans-chrysanthemol

0.14

Peak 6

13.865

Citronellal

0.42

Peak 7

14.370

Isogeranial

1.80

Peak 8

17.193

Citronellol

0.86

Peak 9

17.841

Neral

36.40

Peak 10

18.372

Nerol

1.07

Peak 11

19.189

Geranial

51.17

Peak 12

20.082

2-Undecanone

0.35

Peak 13

24.067

Neryl acetate

1.03

Peak 14

25.707

(E)-Caryophyllene

2.15

Peak 15

29.712

ɣ-candinene

1.37

Peak 16

32.558

Caryophyllene oxide

0.78

TOTAL

 

-

100.00

Table 4: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Ocinum basilicum.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

8.907

Limonene

0.23

Peak 2

9.022

Eucalyptol

0.17

Peak 3

11.639

Linalool

18.34

Peak 4

13.948

Isomenthone

0.17

Peak 5

14.423

Menthol

1.11

Peak 6

16.010

(E)-anethole

77.14

Peak 7

19.101

Geranial

0.39

Peak 8

25.712

(E)-caryophyllene

0.47

Peak 9

26.352

cis-α-bergamotene

0.62

Peak 10

30.822

(Z)-α-bisabolene

1.28

Peak 11

31.903

ρ-methoxy-cinnamaldehyde

0.09

TOTAL

 

-

100,00

Table 5: Chemical characterization of essential oil of Cymbopogon nardus.

 

Peak

Retention time (min)

Component

Concentration (%)

Peak 1

8.892

Limonene

3.17

Peak 2

9.226

1-methyl-piperidine

7.78

Peak 3

11.581

Linalool

0.48

Peak 4

13.554

Isoisopulegol

0.87

Peak 5

13.889

Citronellal

37.75

Peak 6

17.183

Citronellol

14.27

Peak 7

18.380

Geraniol

18.84

Peak 8

22.698

Geranial

0.41

Peak 9

22.698

Citronellyl acetate

3.31

Peak 10

22.973

Eugenol

0.64

Peak 11

24.047

Neryl acetate

2.46

Peak 12

24.468

β-elemene

1.93

Peak 13

28.311

α-cadinene

1.04

Peak 14

29.111

α-muurolene

0.48

Peak 15

29.690

ɣ-cadinene

0.54

Peak 16

30.065

Δ-cadinene

1.71

Peak 17

31.107

α-elemol

2.59

Peak 18

32.194

ɣ-muurolene

1.10

Peak 19

35.328

Cadin-4-en-10-ol

0.63

TOTAL

 

-

100,00

Table 6:  Inhibition hales (mm) of essential oils and phytochemicals against Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis strains.

 

 

 

 

Essential oils and phytochemicals

C. albicans

       C. tropicalis

 

 

 

Cinnamomum camphora

11

14

Melissa officinalis

32

30

Ocimum basilicum

32

30

Cymbopogon nardus

15

30

Alfa pineno

35

30

Citral

32

25

Citronelal

30

30

Carvacrol

 30

30

Nistatina (control)

40

41

References

  1. Almeida LFD, Cavalcanti YW, Viana WP, Lima EO (2010) Screening da atividade antifúngica de óleos essenciais sobre Candida albicans. Rev Bra Ciênc Saúde 14: 51-56.
  2. Arendrup MC (2013) Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology. Dan Med J 60: B4698. [Crossref]
  3. Ayres MCC, Brandão MS, Vieira-Júnior GM, Menor JCAS, Silva HB, et al. (2008) Atividade antibacteriana de plantas úteis e constituintes químicos da raiz de Copernicia prunifera. Rev Bras Farmacogn 18: 90-97.
  4. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M (2008) Biological effects of essential oils - A review. Food Chem Toxicol 46: 446-475. [Crossref]
  5. Barbaro NR, Stelato MM (2009) Atividade anti-Candida de óleos essenciais de plantas utilizadas na culinária. Anais do XIV Encontro de Iniciação Científica da PUC-Campinas 2009: 1-5.
  6. Barreiro EJ, Fraga CAM (2001) Química medicinal: as bases moleculares dos fármacos. Porto Alegre: Artmed 2001.
  7. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 45: 493-496. [Crossref]
  8. Castro HG, Barbosa LCA, Leal TCAB, Souza CM, Nazareno AC (2007) Crescimento, teor e composição química do óleo essencial de Cymbopogon nardus (L). Rev Bras Pl Med 9: 55-61.
  9. Cavalcanti YW, Pérez ALAL, Xavier GDR, Almeida LFD (2011) Efeito inibitório de óleos essenciais sobre microrganismos do canal radicular. Rev Odontol 40: 208-214.
  10. Cleeland R, Squires E (1991) Evaluation of new antimicrobials in vitro and in experimental animal infections In: Lorian, V. Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkiam 739-787.
  11. Dorman DHJ (2000) In vitro evaluation of antioxidant activity of essential oils their components. Flavour Frag J 15: 12-16.
  12. Dutta BK, Karmakar S, Naglot A, Aich JC, Begam M (2007) Anticandidial activity of some essential oils of a mega biodiversity hotspot in India. Mycoses 50: 121-124. [Crossref]
  13. Hadacek F, Greger H (2000) Testing of antifungal natural products: methodologies, comparability of results and assay choice. Phytochem Anal 11: 137-147.
  14. Harris R (2002) Progress with superficial mycoses using essential oils. Int J Aromather 12: 83-91.
  15. Helander LM, Alakomi HL, Latva-Kala K (1998) Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-positive bacteria. J Agric Food Chem 46: 3590-3595.
  16. Henriques M, Azeredo J, Oliveira R (2004) Adhesion of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis to acrylic and hydroxyapatite. Biointerfaces 33: 235-241.
  17. Hussain AI, Anwar F, Sherazi STH, Pizybylski R (2008) Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of basil (Ocimum basilicum) essential oils depends on seasonal variations.  Food Chem 108: 986-995. [Crossref]
  18. Inouye S (2003) Laboratory evaluation of gaseous essential oils (part 1). Int J Aromather 13: 95-107.
  19. Kačániová M, Vukocič N, Horská E, Salamon I, Bobková A, et al. (2014) Environ Sci Health B 49: 505-512.
  20. Keskin DD, Oskay D, Oskay M (2010) Antimicrobial activity of selected plant spices marketed in the West Anatolia. Int J Agr Biol 12: 916-920.
  21. Król SK, Skalicka-Woźniak K, Kandefer-Szerszeń M, Stepulak A (2013) The Biological and pharmacological activity of essential oils in the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) 67:  1000-1007. [Crossref]
  22. Li WR, Shi QS, Ouyang YS, Chen YB, Duan SS (2013) Antifungal effects of citronela oil against Aspergillus niger ATCC 16404. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 7483-7492. [Crossref]
  23. Mahalwl VS, Ali M (2002) Volatile constituents of Cymbopogon nardus (Linn) Rendle. Fragr J 18: 73-76.
  24. Maubon D, Garnaud C, Calandra T, Sanglard D, Cornet M (2014) Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now? Intensive Care Med 40: 1241-1255. [Crossref]
  25. Meneses EA, Cavalcante MS, Farias RB, Teixeira AB, Pinheiro FG, et al. (2005) Frequencia e atividade enzimática de Candida albicans isoladas da mucosa bucal de crianças de uma creche da prefeitura de Fortaleza, Cearpa, Brasil. J Bras Patol Med Lab 4: 9-13.
  26. Mimica Dukic N, Bozin B, Sokovic M, Simin N (2004) Antimicrobial and antioxidant Activities of Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) essential oil.  J Agric Food Chem 52: 2485-2489. [Crossref]
  27. Mohammadi A, Nazari H, Imani S, Amrollahi H (2014) Antifungal activities and chemical composition of some medicinal plants. J Mycol Med 24: 1-8. [Crossref]
  28. Monge RA, Roma’n E, Nombela C, Pla J (2006) The MAP Kinase signal transduction network in Candida albicans. Microbiology 152: 905-912. [Crossref]
  29. Morii D, Seki M, Binongo JN, Ban R, Kobayashi A, et al. (2014) Distribution of Candida species isolated from blood cultures in hospitals in Osaka, Japan. J Infect Chemother 20: 558-562. [Crossref]
  30. Müller V, Viemann D, Schmidt M, Endres N, Ludwing S, et al. (2007) Candida albicans triggers activation of distinct signaling pathways to establish a proinflammatory gene expression program in primary human endothelial cells. J Immunol 179: 8435-8445. [Crossref]
  31. Nascimento PFC, Nascimento ALC, Rodrigues CS, Antoniolli AR, Santos PO, et al. (2007) Antimicrobial activity of the Essentials oils: a multifactor approach of the methods. Br J Pharmacog 17: 108-113.
  32. Oliveira VK, Ruiz LS, Oliveira NA, Moreira D, Hahn RC, et al. (2014) Fungemia caused by Candida species in a children’s public hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: Study in the period 2007-2010. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 56: 301-305. [Crossref]
  33. Orozco AS, Zhou X, Filler SG (2000) Mechanisms of the proinflammatory response of endothelial cells to Candida albicans infection. Infect Immun 68: 1134-1141. [Crossref]
  34. Ostrosky EA, Mizumoto MK, Lima MEL, Kaneko TM, Nishikawa SO, et al. (2008) Methods for evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of plant extracts. Br J Pharmacog 18: 301-307.
  35. Pandey AK, Bora HR, Deka SC, Rastogi RC, Baruah AKS (1997) Composition of the essential oil of the bark od Cinnamomum camphora. J Med Aromatic Plant Sci 19: 408-409.
  36. Pino JA, Fuentes V (1998) Leaf oil of Cinnamomum camphora (L) J Presl From Cuba. J Essent Oil Res 10: 531-532.
  37. Ramage G, Saville SP, Thomas DP, López-Ribot JL (2005) Candida biofilms: an update. Eukaryot Cell 4: 633-638. [Crossref]
  38. Ríos JL, Recio MC (2005) Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. J Ethnopharmacol 100: 80-84. [Crossref]
  39. Setzer WN, Vogler B, Schimidt JM, Leahy JG, Rives R (2004) Antimicrobial activity of Artemisia douglasiana leaf essential oil. Fitoterapia 75: 192-200. [Crossref]
  40. Shahapur PR, Bidri RC (2014) Recent trends in the spectrum of opportunistic infections in human immunodeficiency virus infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy in South India. J Nat Sci Biol Med 5: 392-396. [Crossref]
  41. Silva S, Sato A, Lage CLS, Gil RASS, Azevedo DA, et al. (2005) Essential oil composition of Melissa officinalis L. in vitro produced under the influence of growth regulators. J Braz Chem Soc 16: 1387-1389.
  42. Tang HJ, Liu WL, Lin HL, Lai CC (2014) Epidemiology and prognostic factors of candidemia in cancer patients. PLoS One 9: e99103.
  43. Thein ZM, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP (2006) Effect of oral bacteria on growth and survival of Candida albicans biofilms. Arch Oral Biol 51: 672-680. [Crossref]
  44. Thosar N, Basak S, Bahadure RN, Rajurkar M (2013) Antimicrobial efficacy of five essential oils against oral pathogens: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent 7: 71-77. [Crossref]
  45. Tortorano AM, Kibbler C, Peman J, Bernhardt H, Klingspor L, et al. (2006) Candidaemia in Europe: epidemiology and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents 27: 359-366. [Crossref]
  46. Viegas Jr C, Bolzani VS, Barreiro EJ (2006) The natural products and the modern medicine. Quim Nova 29: 326-337.
  47. Williamson EM (2001) Synergy and other interactions in phytomedicines. Phytomedicine 8: 401-409. [Crossref]
  48. Zielińska S, Matkowski A (2014) Phytochemistry and bioactivity of aromatic and medicinal plants from the genus Agastache (Lamiaceae). Phytochem Rev 13: 391-416. [Crossref]
  49. Zilberberg MD, Kothari S, Shorr AF (2009) Cost-effectiveness of micafugin as an alternative to fluconazole empiric treatment of suspected ICU-acquired candidemia among patients with sepsis: a model simulation. Crit Care 13: R94. [Crossref]
  50. Zore GB, Thakre AD, Jadhav S, Karuppayil SM (2011) Terpenoids inhibit Candida albicans growth by affecting membrane integrity and arrest of cell cycle. Phytomedicine 18: 1181-1190. [Crossref]