Human and Animal Studies in Craniofacial Embryology Enrich Human Postnatal Craniofacial Insight Differently
Human and Animal Studies in Craniofacial Embryology Enrich Human Postnatal Craniofacial Insight Differently
Download Citation in txt
Download Citation in bib
Download Citation in ris
Author Info
Corresponding Author
Inger KjaerDepartment of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
A B S T R A C T
Objectives: To compare results obtained since 1970 from craniofacial embryological studies on human fetal tissues with results from similar studies performed on animal tissues and focus on how the different tissue types and methods can enrich the human postnatal craniofacial research. There are three sections: i) research on normal and pathological human fetal material, ii) animal experimental research performed on different species, and iii) comparisons of the results obtained. Human Material: On human prenatal material, normal and pathological developmental processes in the mandible, maxilla, nasal cavity, body axis, cranial base, vomeronasal organs, pituitary gland and nervous system were related to postnatal findings. Specific focus was given to pre/postnatal bridging of observations on holoprosencephaly, cleft lip/palate, Down syndrome, myelomeningocele/spina bifida, Kallmann syndrome, Turner syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. Demarcations of pathological regions in Cri du chat, Velo-cardio-Facial syndrome and Crouzon syndrome were mapped. Animal Material: Animal experimental results from studies on the notochord, gastrulation, neural crest, hindbrain, rhombomere, homeobox genes and experimentally induced malformation were presented. Comparing materials: The educational background of the scientists performing human and animal research, their postnatal clinical experience, the research materials used and the methods available for research are compared. Furthermore, the obtained findings result in a “pro et contra list” indicating what is positive and what is negative for improving postnatal human diagnostics. Conclusion: Human and animal studies in craniofacial embryology enrich human postnatal craniofacial insight differently. Future cooperation between human and animal research cultures is recommended.
Article Info
Article Type
Review ArticlePublication history
Received: Tue 29, Dec 2020Accepted: Wed 13, Jan 2021
Published: Wed 27, Jan 2021
Copyright
© 2023 Inger Kjaer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.DOBCR.2021.01.02