article = {DOBCR-2019-2-101}
title = {Conceptual model to optimize implant positioning in edentulous mandible treated with an over denture; A case series preliminary report }
journal = {Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research}
year = {2019}
issn = {2613-4950}
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.31487/j.DOBCR.2019.02.01}
url = {https://www.sciencerepository.org/conceptual-model-to-optimize-implant-positioning-in-edentulous-mandible-treated-with-an-over-denture-a-case-series-preliminary-report_DOBCR-2019-2-101 
author = { Kazuhiko  Kaneda,Kouhei  Shinmyouzu,Maki  Nishimura,Saho  Kobayashi,Takuya  Yamada,}
keywords = {implant over denture (IOD),  implant positioning,  zoning method,  locator attachment}
abstract ={Statement of problem: There are no clear diagnostic guidelines for producing a mandibular implant
overdenture (IOD).
Purpose: The aim of this clinical report was to present a set of principles that can be used during diagnosis
and treatment planning for later ideal implant positioning and promotion of optimal patient-centered
outcomes.
Materials and Methods: With our novel method for determining an ideal implant position, the mandibular
arch is divided into 3 zones (Zone 1, 2, 3) according to the relationship between the alveolar crest and
artificial tooth position. Following implant placement, the patient is provided with a mandibular IOD.
At the 2-year follow-up evaluation of prostheses placed in 2 patients, the chief complaints were totally
resolved, and no complications were noted.
Conclusions: Although out findings are limited, they indicate that the present diagnostic method for
planning mandibular IOD treatment results in a good outcome. Future well-designed clinical studies are
necessary before making definitive conclusions.
}