Left Facial Primary Leiomyosarcoma Misdiagnosed as Atypical Fibroxanthoma and Immunochemical Markers Relevant to Diagnosis: A Case Report

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest?

Comments: Yes, the topic is relevant to the journal area of interest.

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

Comments: The abstract and keywords seem well-constructed and relevant, effectively summarizing the case report and highlighting its key aspects.

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

Comments: The goal of the paper is not explicitly stated in the introduction.

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

Comments: The paper follows a coherent structure typical of a medical case report, consisting of sections like Introduction, Case Presentation, Discussion, and Conclusion.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

Comments: The author's use of relevant literature aids in establishing the context of the case, substantiates the diagnostic challenges presented, and aligns with the broader scientific understanding of these conditions. This approach enhances the credibility of the case report and ensures that it is grounded in current medical knowledge and research.

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

Comments: The length of the paper appears to be adequate for the significance of the topic. Given the complexity and rarity of leiomyosarcoma, especially when misdiagnosed as atypical fibroxanthoma, a detailed exploration of the case, including background information, case specifics, discussion, and conclusions, is necessary. The paper effectively covers these aspects without seeming overly verbose or unnecessarily detailed.

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Each figure is accompanied by a legend that is both informative and specific, offering clear insights into the surgical process, the extent of the lesion, and the post-operative results. This effective use of figures and clear legends enhances the paper's value by providing visual context to the textual descriptions, thereby aiding in a better understanding of the case and its complexities. The use of these figures aligns well with the paper’s focus on the diagnostic and treatment challenges of the case, contributing significantly to the overall narrative.

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: The writing style of the paper is clear and understandable. It uses precise and technical language appropriate for a medical case report, which effectively communicates the complex details of the case.

Further comments on the paper

Comments:

This medical case report is well-structured, effectively utilizing detailed descriptions, relevant literature, and visual aids to explore a complex case of leiomyosarcoma misdiagnosed as atypical fibroxanthoma. Although the specific goal could be more explicitly stated, the paper successfully highlights the diagnostic challenges and underscores the importance of accurate pathological analysis. The use of clear and technical language, along with organized presentation, enhances its readability for medical professionals. Overall, it's a valuable contribution to the literature on rare soft tissue sarcomas.

Reviewer 1
This paper presents a well-documented case of leiomyosarcoma, offering significant insights into diagnostic complexities. The detailed descriptions and effective use of figures enhance understanding. However, the paper would benefit from a clearer statement of its primary goal in the introduction. Additionally, some sections might be condensed without losing essential information, ensuring a more concise presentation.

Reviewer 2
The case report is informative and well-structured, with a clear focus on the diagnostic challenge of leiomyosarcoma. The use of relevant literature and detailed case presentation are commendable. Clarity in the writing style aids comprehension, though non-specialist readers might find the technical language challenging. A refinement in the goal statement would further strengthen the paper.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes- This manuscript is recommended for further publication

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team