Automated Quantification of CD44, c-MET, EGFR, MTOR, and GLUT1 Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Impact of p16 Status and Response to Chemoradiation
Automated Quantification of CD44, c-MET, EGFR, MTOR, and GLUT1 Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Impact of p16 Status and Response to Chemoradiation
Review Data
The manuscript entitled “Automated quantification of CD44, c-MET, EGFR, MTOR, and GLUT1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: The impact of p16 status and response to chemoradiation” is an interesting study.
Purpose and Significance of Study: This study involved the automated quantification of the expression of several biomarkers namely CD44, c-MET, MTOR, EGFR, and GLUT1 in head and neck cancer specimens from patients who underwent definitive chemoradiation. This is the first study that used automated analysis to interrogate the potential prognostic significance of biomarkers using a tissue microarray and biomarkers which had previously been shown to have significant prognostic value using semi-quantitative visual inspection.
The manuscript is very well-written. Some very minor errors (already corrected in the galley proof) are listed below –
The common errors are –
· Omission of articles, e.g., “the” before “representative” in the 2nd sentence of Patient selection and generation of TMA in the Materials and Methods, before “patients” in the 4th sentence of Biomarkers and clinical outcomes in the Results, and so on.
· Omission of “,”, e.g., after “general” in the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph in the Introduction, after “pathologist” in the 2nd sentence of Patient selection and generation of TMA in the Materials and Methods, and so on.
· Usage of singular instead of plural number, e.g., in the 5th sentence of the 3rd paragraph and in the last paragraph of the Abstract, “expression” must be replaced with “expressions”, in the last sentence of the last paragraph of the Introduction, “biomarker” after “quantification of” must be replaced with “biomarkers”, and so on.
· “Intensity-modulated” and “high-resolution” must be hyphenated.
· “e.g.” and “i.e.” must be followed by “,”, and “etc” must be followed by “.”.
The others are –
In the Materials and Methods –
Under Immunohistochemistry –
· In the last sentence, “chromogen” is misspelled.
In the Results –
Under Biomarker analysis –
In the last paragraph –
· In the 1st sentence, “and” after “;” must be removed.
Under Biomarkers and clinical outcomes –
In the 4th paragraph –
· In the 1st sentence, “are” must be replaced with “is”.
In the Discussion –
In the 1st paragraph –
· In the 10th sentence, “median” after “103” must be removed as it is repeated.
The manuscript is therefore recommended for publication in Clinical Oncology and Research.
Jessica D. Arden
Thomas J. Quinn
Thomas G. Wilson
Alaa Hanna
Kenneth Barker
Rohan Deraniyagala
Andrew M. Baschnagel
George Wilson
Author Info
Corresponding Author
George Wilson
Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Wed 13, May 2020
Accepted: Mon 01, Jun 2020
Published: Fri 12, Jun 2020
Copyright
© 2023 George Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.COR.2020.06.03