Thymomas: Analysis of Histological Subtypes and Staging in Patients with Surgical Treatment in Two Reference Centers in Argentina

Thymomas: Analysis of Histological Subtypes and Staging in Patients with Surgical Treatment in Two Reference Centers in Argentina

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Very good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Very good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Very good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments:

The Discussion encompasses the relevant findings from the previous studies on thymomas and provides a thorough analysis of the findings and their implications. The study discusses that the importance of focusing the attention of certain pathologies in referral centers has shown greater diagnostic effectiveness and a reduction in the mortality rate and complications. It also adequately discusses the literature. The study further Concludes that the retrospective implementation of the 8th edition of TNM staging highlights the need to standardize protocols for pathological and surgical studies.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Very good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Very good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This retrospective descriptive study aims to describe the clinical, histological, surgical and oncological characteristics of a cohort of patients with a diagnosis of thymoma surgically treated in two centers in Argentina and to evaluate the possibility of retrospectively implementing the 8th edition of TNM staging. The study conducted on 180 patients surgically treated from January 1972 to November 2019 holds significance as it has been able to establish the T and M descriptor retrospectively, with the histopathology records. The series presentation is also the largest of its kind from Latin America. In the current work, it is important to highlight that the vast majority of cases treated at the public health center, far exceeds the private practice with 85% of cases.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Ana Karina Patane
Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Rehabilitacion Respiratoria Maria Ferrer, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Article Info

Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Mon 05, Jul 2021
Accepted: Wed 21, Jul 2021
Published: Mon 02, Aug 2021
Copyright
© 2023 Ana Karina Patane. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.COR.2021.08.01