Thymomas: Analysis of Histological Subtypes and Staging in Patients with Surgical Treatment in Two Reference Centers in Argentina
Thymomas: Analysis of Histological Subtypes and Staging in Patients with Surgical Treatment in Two Reference Centers in Argentina
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Very good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Very good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Very good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Good
Comments:
The Discussion encompasses the relevant findings from the previous studies on thymomas and provides a thorough analysis of the findings and their implications. The study discusses that the importance of focusing the attention of certain pathologies in referral centers has shown greater diagnostic effectiveness and a reduction in the mortality rate and complications. It also adequately discusses the literature. The study further Concludes that the retrospective implementation of the 8th edition of TNM staging highlights the need to standardize protocols for pathological and surgical studies.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Very good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This retrospective descriptive study aims to describe the clinical, histological, surgical and oncological characteristics of a cohort of patients with a diagnosis of thymoma surgically treated in two centers in Argentina and to evaluate the possibility of retrospectively implementing the 8th edition of TNM staging. The study conducted on 180 patients surgically treated from January 1972 to November 2019 holds significance as it has been able to establish the T and M descriptor retrospectively, with the histopathology records. The series presentation is also the largest of its kind from Latin America. In the current work, it is important to highlight that the vast majority of cases treated at the public health center, far exceeds the private practice with 85% of cases.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Ana Karina Patane Claudia Poleri Liliana Vila Basile Florencia Guman Gabriela Raya Mercedes Rivero Hector Rosales Adolfo Rosenberg Moises
Corresponding Author
Ana Karina PataneThoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Rehabilitacion Respiratoria Maria Ferrer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Article Info
Article Type
Research ArticlePublication history
Received: Mon 05, Jul 2021Accepted: Wed 21, Jul 2021
Published: Mon 02, Aug 2021
Copyright
© 2023 Ana Karina Patane. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.COR.2021.08.01