Primary Vaginal Leiomyosarcoma: A Rare Case Reported in Uruguay

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest?

Comments: Yes, the topic is relevant to the journal area of interest.

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

Comments: The abstract concisely presents the introduction, case, treatment, and conclusion, summarizing the report's critical points effectively. However, the keywords could be more specific to enhance searchability. "Vaginal leiomyosarcoma" is a good choice, but additional terms like "high-grade sarcoma" and "vaginal tumor" should ensure relevance​.

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

Comments: Yes, the goal is clearly stated in the introduction, focusing on the clinical case of primary vaginal leiomyosarcoma and contributing to the management of such rare entities.

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

Comments: The structure is coherent and well-organized. It follows a logical flow: starting with the introduction, moving through the clinical case, discussion, and concluding with treatment recommendations.

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

Comments: The discussion and conclusion appropriately relate to the case and results. The analysis of treatment options, prognosis, and outcomes ties directly to the presented case, making it coherent and relevant.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

Comments: The author uses a range of relevant literature to support the case, particularly in discussing previous cases of vaginal leiomyosarcoma and treatment options​.

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

Comments: The length is appropriate for the significance of the topic. Given the rarity of the condition, the detailed case and treatment discussion are essential. Shortening might risk losing critical details​.

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Figures are suitably used to complement the text, with clear legends that explain the images. The notations are sufficiently detailed to enhance understanding​.

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: The writing style is clear and understandable. The clinical details are explained concisely, making the paper accessible to its target audience.

Further comments on the paper

Comments:

Overall, the paper is well-structured and contributes valuable insights into the rare condition of primary vaginal leiomyosarcoma. Minor improvements in keyword selection could enhance its reach.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - This manuscript is recommended for further publication

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team