Advanced Screening Technologies and Their Applications in Gynaecological Cytology: Can It Be a Pyrrhic Victory?
Advanced Screening Technologies and Their Applications in Gynaecological Cytology: Can It Be a Pyrrhic Victory?
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: --
Comments: Not applicable
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: --
Comments: Not applicable
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: --
Comments: Not applicable
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: --
Comments: Not applicable
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Very good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: --
Comments: Not applicable
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Weak
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This review analyses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted cytopathology on diagnostic medicine. Artificial intelligence, based on deep learning algorithms, enables intelligent recognition of the cervical cytology specimens, optimizes diagnostic accuracy and enhances operational processes. This study also highlights some additional challenges and ethical issues which will take time to be resolved and also suggests that AI can be the strategy which has the capability to augment cytology practice and to improve decision-making with an aim to obtain best possible performance in population‐based cervical cancer screening.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Corresponding Author
Thaís HeinkeAssociate Professor, Pathology Department of UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Article Info
Article Type
Review ArticlePublication history
Received: Mon 14, Sep 2020Accepted: Tue 29, Sep 2020
Published: Wed 14, Oct 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Thaís Heinke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.DPO.2020.01.01