Effect of Gplife Advance Diabetic Support on Time in Range in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Case Report

Effect of Gplife Advance Diabetic Support on Time in Range in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Case Report

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments: The Discussion gives a complete overview of the time in range (TIR) metric scale for estimating the effectiveness of antidiabetic therapy. The authors also put forth the association between time in range score with the development of various microvascular complications related to diabetes. The Discussion further states the mode of action of Gplife, providing relevant literature. 

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legends and notations clear?

A: Good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Comments: There are few errors found in the manuscript, which are as follows.

·       Under Case Report, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence, “Twenty number of patient’s having 14 males and 6 females with average age of 50 years…” is rewritten as “Twenty patient’s including 14 males and 6 females, with an average age of 50 years…”.

·       Under Discussion, 7th sentence, “The percentage of time spend by the patient outside the range…” must be written as “The percentage of time spent by the patient outside the range…”.

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The Case Report presents 20 patients with a known history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The report mainly highlights the effect of Gplife advance diabetic support on time in range in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. The manuscript further illustrates the overall treatment procedure providing possible results.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions or clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Shridhar Pandya
Director, Gplife Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Surat, India

Article Info

Article Type
Case Report
Publication history
Received: Mon 31, Oct 2022
Accepted: Mon 12, Dec 2022
Published: Fri 13, Jan 2023
Copyright
© 2023 Shridhar Pandya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.JDMC.2022.01.02