A Re-Evaluation of Past to Present-Day Use of the Blissful Neuronal Nutraceutical “Cannabis”
A Re-Evaluation of Past to Present-Day Use of the Blissful Neuronal Nutraceutical “Cannabis”
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Very good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Excellent
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Very good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Very good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them coherent?
A: Very good
Comments:
Cannabis is one of the oldest botanicals known to humans. This review article provides noteworthy details about the different religious beliefs and opinions as well as major use and contraindications of Cannabis. The study is well supported with briefly explained figure and tables. This article effectively describes the relevant literature and enlists the implications of the findings from the present study in that context. The review supports and lays the basis for validating the comprehensive, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic research perspective that can be further analysed. It provides significantly relevant information which will help to improve the legal status of cannabis. The Conclusions are consistent with the evidences presented in this article.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Very good
Length
Q: Is the paper's length adequate to the topic's significance? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Very good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Very good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This review article explores the “cannabis custom” and discusses cannabis in various civilizations and religions from the past to the present day. This study holds significance as the use and consumption of cannabis have been an integral part of various cultures, civilizations, and religions throughout history to today. This review aptly states both therapeutic value of cannabis as well as probable cautions that need to be maintained.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions or clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Rishi M. Nadar Kelli McDonald Jack Deruiter Suhrud Pathak Sindhu Ramesh Reeta Vijayarani Kruti Gopal Jayachandra Babu Ramapuram Kamal Dua Timothy Moore Jun Ren Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran
Corresponding Author
Muralikrishnan DhanasekaranDepartment of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
Article Info
Article Type
Review ArticlePublication history
Received: Wed 07, Sep 2022Accepted: Wed 21, Sep 2022
Published: Thu 13, Oct 2022
Copyright
© 2023 Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.JFNM.2022.01.02