Evaluation of the Effects of Silver Nitrate Renal Pelvic Instillation and Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Pedicle Lymphatic Disconnection for Chyluria
Evaluation of the Effects of Silver Nitrate Renal Pelvic Instillation and Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Pedicle Lymphatic Disconnection for Chyluria
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Good
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Very good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Very good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Good
Comments:
The Discussion thoroughly analyses the presenting symptoms of the patients and explores the most probable effective and feasible solution for the treatment of chyluria. The outcomes of the study led to the Conclusion that retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection had a higher cure rate and lower recurrence rate than in transurethral cystoscopic silver nitrate renal pelvic instillation, therefore being the first choice of treatment for chyluria, whereas patients with mild symptoms and no intention to undergo a major surgery can opt for the latter option as it has shorter operative times and less intraoperative blood loss.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very Good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Very good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This retrospective study on 40 patients provides a comparison between the efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of transurethral cystoscopic silver nitrate renal pelvic instillation and retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection for the treatment of an endemic disease, chyluria. Operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, cure rate, complication rate, and recurrence rate showed significant differences between the patients of both the groups undergoing the treatments.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Ze Zhang Hao Wu Shenglin Gao Jiasheng Chen Chao Lu Weijiang Mao Xingyu Wu Tianle Cheng Lifeng Zhang Li Zuo
Corresponding Author
Lifeng ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Affliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
Article Info
Article Type
Research ArticlePublication history
Received: Mon 27, Jul 2020Accepted: Tue 18, Aug 2020
Published: Wed 26, Aug 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Lifeng Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.JSO.2020.04.09