Evaluation of the Effects of Silver Nitrate Renal Pelvic Instillation and Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Pedicle Lymphatic Disconnection for Chyluria

Evaluation of the Effects of Silver Nitrate Renal Pelvic Instillation and Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Pedicle Lymphatic Disconnection for Chyluria

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

 

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Very good

 

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

 

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

 

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Very good

 

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

 

Comments:

The Discussion thoroughly analyses the presenting symptoms of the patients and explores the most probable effective and feasible solution for the treatment of chyluria. The outcomes of the study led to the Conclusion that retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection had a higher cure rate and lower recurrence rate than in transurethral cystoscopic silver nitrate renal pelvic instillation, therefore being the first choice of treatment for chyluria, whereas patients with mild symptoms and no intention to undergo a major surgery can opt for the latter option as it has shorter operative times and less intraoperative blood loss.

 

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Very Good

 

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

 

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

 

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

 

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Very good

 

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This retrospective study on 40 patients provides a comparison between the efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of transurethral cystoscopic silver nitrate renal pelvic instillation and retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection for the treatment of an endemic disease, chyluria. Operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, cure rate, complication rate, and recurrence rate showed significant differences between the patients of both the groups undergoing the treatments.

 

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team

 
 

Author Info

Corresponding Author
Lifeng Zhang
Department of Urology, The Affliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China

Article Info

Article Type
Research Article
Publication history
Received: Mon 27, Jul 2020
Accepted: Tue 18, Aug 2020
Published: Wed 26, Aug 2020
Copyright
© 2023 Lifeng Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.
DOI: 10.31487/j.JSO.2020.04.09