Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Versus Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Study of 483 Patients
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Versus Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Study of 483 Patients
Review Data
Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for
researchers?
A: Excellent
Abstract & Keywords
Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?
A: Very good
Goal
Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?
A: Very good
Structure
Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?
A: Good
Tools and Methods
Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?
A: Good
Discussion & Conclusion
Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?
A: Good
Comments:
The Discussion encompasses the relevant findings from the previous studies on clinical characteristics and outcomes of cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (C-HCC) and non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (NC-HCC) patients and provides a thorough analysis of the findings and their implications. This study provides important overview on the differences between NC-HCC and C-HCC patients in a European cohort. The Conclusions are consistent with the evidences presented in this article. Further it concludes that the NC-HCC patients were older with a higher female prevalence.
Literature
Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?
A: Very good
Author's knowledge
Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?
A: Good
Length
Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?
A: Good
Figures & Tables
Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?
A: Very good
Writing style
Q: Is it clear and understandable?
A: Good
Further comments on the paper
Comments: This retrospective study compares non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhotic HCC patients, by taking into consideration demographic characteristics, risk factors, tumor stage, treatment and survival. The HCC development in non-cirrhotic patients represents a serious health problem, making this study significant. As suggested by recent data, obesity, diabetes, non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) are risk factors associated with HCC development, which represents an alarming issue, as the NAFLD prevalence globally is high and increasing. While the current study included a relatively large number of patients, it is limited by its retrospective nature and single centre data. Also, despite extensive tests, the study could not establish the underlying liver disease in 14.9 % of NC-HCC and 2.3 % of C-HCC cases.
Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?
A: Yes - Suitable to be published
If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.
Thanks,
Science Repository Team
Science Repository This email is restricted to the intended user. |
Science Repository - Support |
Author Info
Pompilia Radu Guillaume Aeby Birgit Schwacha-Eipper Philippe Kolly Codruta Mare Vanessa Banz JeanFrançois Dufour
Corresponding Author
Pompilia RaduHepatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Article Info
Article Type
Research ArticlePublication history
Received: Fri 11, Dec 2020Accepted: Mon 28, Dec 2020
Published: Mon 08, Feb 2021
Copyright
© 2023 Pompilia Radu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.DOI: 10.31487/j.JSO.2020.06.07