Review Article: Clinical Symptoms and Structures Involved in Isolated Infarcts in the Branches of the Anterior, Middle, and Posterior Cerebral Arteries

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal's area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Very good

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Not Applicable.

Comments:

Abstract and Keywords should be incorporated.

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Very good

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Very good

Tools and Methods

Q: Are the methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Very good

Comments:

The Introduction lays down the basics for taking up the present study. The review article effectively describes the relevant literature. Based on the data obtained from relevant literature, the study Concludes that isolated infarcts of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) are rare. The article provides relevant information about a research perspective that can be further analysed and aptly recommends future research focusing on the variations of the vascular supplies and their clinical syndromes.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Very good

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

Length

Q: Is the paper's length adequate to the topic's significance? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Not applicable.

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Very good

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This review article aims to clearly name the major individual branches of the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral arteries and list the structures they supply, in order to correlate the individual branches to the clinical symptoms. This article holds significance as a precise understanding of isolated branch infarcts will deepen clinical acumen and optimize diagnostic management.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team