The Utilization of a Nitric Oxide Generating Serum for Improving Vascularity in Wound Healing

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

Comments: Abstract must be provided.

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

Comments: The section of Discussion describes the importance of health benefits of the natural presence of nitric oxide in body. The Conclusion also discusses the ability of the tropical application of nitric oxide (NO) generating serum in various wounds for improving vascularity which helps in improving the rate and quality of healing.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good.

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Comments: Except in Introduction, 1^st paragraph, 2^nd sentence, “Many disease states such as diabetes, renal failure, and atherosclerosis predispose a patient to delayed or impeded healing” must be framed properly.

Further comments on the paper

Comments: The pilot study highlights on the benefits of the treatment with nitric oxide generating serum on wound healing in which 25 patients with various wound were examined. The study population brought out satisfactory results among the patients.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team