Fibrous Dysplasia of the Frontal Sinus Presenting with Periorbital Emphysema

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest? Is it contemporary and interesting for

researchers?

A: Good

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

A: Good

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

A: Good

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

A: Good

Tools and Methods

Q: Are methods the author uses adequate and well used?

A: Good

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

A: Good

Comments: The discussion illustrates craniofacial fibrous dysplasia (CFD), highlighting the place of origin and the cause of occurrence, providing relevant literature. It also gives the probable clinical symptoms occurring among FD patients followed by the possible diagnosis and treatment method. Lastly, it describes the uniqueness of the reported case of the 22-year-old male with FD. It concludes by providing the briefing of the overall case report.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

A: Good

Author's knowledge

Q: What is the level of the author’s knowledge? Does the author utilize all recent contributions relevant to the topic?

A: Good

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

A: Good

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: Good

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: Good

Comments: In Background, 1^st paragraph, 2^nd sentence, “the more common monostotic form with one focus of disease” must be written as “the more common monostotic form with one disease focus”.

Further comments on the paper

Comments: This case presents a 22-year-old male with fibrous dysplasia (FD) of the frontal sinus. The case further describes the clinical and radiographic examination followed by the probable treatment procedure for the cure of the disease. The report reviews the presentation and treatment of FD for the paranasal sinuses and puts forth the combined external and endoscopic approach to resection of the frontal sinus mass.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - Suitable to be published

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team