Splenectomy before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Two Cases

Review Data

Q: Is the topic relevant to the journal area of interest?

Comments: Yes, the topic is relevant to the journal area of interest.

Abstract & Keywords

Q: Are all required components included in the abstract? Are the keywords appropriately chosen?

Comments: The abstract includes essential elements: a brief introduction to myelofibrosis, treatment options, the significance of splenectomy, and a summary of the cases presented.
As for the keywords, they are not explicitly mentioned in the manuscript.

Goal

Q: Is the goal explicitly stated in the Introduction? Is its formulation clear and unambiguous?

Comments: The goal is clearly stated in the introduction, which is to evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy before allo-HSCT in patients with myelofibrosis. The formulation is clear and unambiguous.

Structure

Q: Is the paper's structure coherent? Is it in coherence with the goal of the paper?

Comments: The structure of the paper is coherent. It follows a logical sequence: introduction, case reports, discussion, and conclusion.

Discussion & Conclusion

Q: Is it related to the results presented before? Do you consider them as coherent?

Comments: The discussion and conclusion sections are directly related to the results presented. They analyze the findings from the cases and relate them to existing literature.

Both sections are coherent and logically follow from the results.

Literature

Q: Does the author utilize relevant literature?

Comments: The authors utilize relevant literature to support their findings and discussion points. The references are pertinent and enhance the credibility of the study.

Length

Q: Is the length of the paper adequate to the significance of the topic? Do you suggest shortening the paper without losing its value?

Comments: The length of the paper is adequate given the significance of the topic. It provides sufficient detail without being overly lengthy.

Suggestions: No shortening is necessary as the content is succinct yet comprehensive.

Figures & Tables

Q: Does the author use them suitably? Are legend and notations clear?

A: The figures and tables are used suitably to illustrate key points, such as leukocyte count, neutrophil count, and platelet count before and after splenectomy and allo-HSCT.

Legends and notations are clear and help in understanding the data presented.

Writing style

Q: Is it clear and understandable?

A: The writing style is clear and understandable. The language is precise, and medical terminologies are used appropriately.

Further comments on the paper

Comments:

The paper is well-written and structured. The case reports are detailed and provide valuable insights into the treatment of myelofibrosis with splenectomy before allo-HSCT.

Suggestions for Improvement: Minor improvements can be made in the discussion section by elaborating on the implications of the findings for future research and clinical practice.

Q: Would you recommend this manuscript for further publication?

A: Yes - This manuscript is recommended for further publication

If you have any questions and clarifications you can write to the journal.

Thanks,
Science Repository Team